Advocating strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions to a level supportive of a livable climate.

Author: Kevin Cross Page 2 of 11

Keep Colorado Nuclear Free – Stop HB 26-1337!

Colorado Representatives have introduced HB26-1337, a bill that would force nuclear energy on Colorado by legally mandating the development of at least one nuclear energy project by 2040.

This bill, if passed, would charge Colorado taxpayers $20 million to subsidize the development of nuclear power plants, which are being pushed by tech giants to generate power for data centers, all while threatening Colorado’s ability to provide clean water for its residents and perpetuating the creation of “sacrifice zones.”

Nuclear power is anything but “clean”; it produces radioactive waste, relies on uranium mining, and puts frontline communities and workers at risk.

If you do not want nuclear power plants to be forced on Colorado, please take the following actions to oppose this bill:

Click Here to Sign up to Testify on Wednesday 4/22!
https://sites.coleg.gov/public-testimony/sign-up-to-testify/step-1

Click Here to View the Action Toolkit & Learn More!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bh9vGaUGRHMCBWr4f52bE_GnE964yeeE/view

Click Here to Send a 1-Click Letter to Legislators
https://fastdemocracy.com/campaigns/cFZiKnjCE/Take-ACTION–OPPOSE-HB26-1337-Facilitating-Nuclear-Energy-Development/

Click Here to Join the Nuclear-Free CO Listserv!
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScg8_szjNYnDG_jIJk-8e3kDiv6jj4Ngs9A6z5uEZ7U0hgupw/viewform

Stop Bad Data Center Bill HB26-1030

The bad data center bill, HB26-1030, keeps bein postponed, but we need to make sure that nothing like it passes and that Colorado Legislators know we do NOT want our state to be sold out to data center developers!

This bill, at its core, is a giveaway to big tech; energy and water resources would be prioritized for data centers, potentially used to power AI surveillance and ICE, at the expense of Coloradans’ health, safety, tax dollars, and environment.

If you do not want to see Colorado’s resources and communities exploited for data center buildouts, take action to oppose this bill!

English and Spanish advocacy resources are available (big thanks to Conservation Colorado for providing the Spanish translation!), and thanks to Nuclear Free Colorado, Roots to Resilience, CCLC, PSR Colorado, and GreenLatinos, for supporting this toolkit! If you would like to sign on your organization to be added to the toolkit as an endorser, you can sign on and add your logo here!

Feel free to use and distribute any of the following resources: 

HB26-1030 Info & Action Toolkit English   

HB26-1030 Info & Action Toolkit Spanish  

– Downloadable social media graphics English
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1VPCtD-dM2pTLQXLpflJJoW5K69lfhwMp

– Downloadable social media graphics Spanish  
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/108cdlzVUdKhoWOqSyRrLUp2tqIVKbU8J

– Downloadable half-page printable flyers English  
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NEmblFHqbFw1qGASrvzGV2boI8lwYMQW/view

– Downloadable half-page printable flyers Spanish
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TfutgahV8x846yWRw3wDc6zvOae4f2Pb/view

Take Action on Data Centers: Write Legislators to Oppose HB-1030 and Support SB-102

Please send a personalized message today telling your state legislators to support SB26-102 to help control data center air pollution, water usage, energy burdens, noise and other local and statewide impacts, and to stop HB26-1030, which would give corporations $58 million in tax breaks to attract more new data centers.

For more details and a sample letter, please visit this PSR-Colorado webpage.

Climate Alarmism is a Good Thing

Chris Hoffman, Boulder Daily Camera, February 27th, 2026

In his recent column, Bjorn Lomborg says, “the global retreat from climate alarmism is a good thing.” There are two problems with this assertion: (1) There has not been a retreat; and (2) saying so, and saying that it’s “a good thing,” is not helpful.

About the “retreat” assertion: The Yale Program on Climate Change Communications has been studying opinions about climate change for over a decade. According to the Yale Program: “Over the past ten years, the Alarmed have grown more than any other audience, from 11% in 2015 to 25% in 2025 (+14 percentage points). Overall, Americans are becoming more worried about global warming, more engaged with the issue, and more supportive of climate solutions.”   

Lomborg advances a lot of points that amount to cherry picking. Here’s what the London School of Economics has to say about his work: “Dr Lomborg provides a masterclass in the use of inaccurate and misleading sources to construct a bogus narrative.”

Finally, Bjorn Lomborg’s words are not helpful. In 2026, with climate-change-supersized floods, fires, droughts and hurricanes evident to all, we don’t have time for any more distractions from merchants of doubt. Exxon and other fossil fuel companies have been running the distraction play for almost half a century. The Keeling Curve keeps rising. It’s time to move on to solutions. And solutions exist … technical solutions such as solar energy, and policy solutions like a carbon tax that rebates money to households and boosts the economy. 

I know that everyone has a lot on their minds right now, given the current political climate. But the physical climate that we depend on is a matter of physics and chemistry and won’t wait for us to calm down. Later is too late. Contact your local, state, and national legislators and demand meaningful climate action.

Chris Hoffman, Boulder

Move Beyond False Choices in Energy Policy

Chris Hoffman, Denver Post, February 22nd, 2026

Re: “Global energy demand is rising as Colorado is still restricting operations,” Feb. 15 commentary

In her opinion column on global energy demand, Lynn Granger creates a false dichotomy when she states, “Colorado politics has framed energy policy as a moral choice rather than a systems challenge.” Energy policy is both a moral choice and a systems challenge.

Given the scientific consensus that fossil fuels are the root cause of the climate crisis, and given the impacts we’ve seen here in Colorado — including the fires, floods, beetle-kill, meager snowpacks, and the dire condition of the Colorado River — doing anything other than constraining the burning of fossil fuels can be considered a crime against the people of Colorado.

And, given that the whole planet shares the same atmosphere, any steps that would perpetuate or increase the burning of fossil fuels in Colorado could readily be considered crimes against humanity. Energy policy is indeed a moral choice.

And energy policy is also a systems challenge. Our challenge is to transition our energy systems from huge, established, and entrenched extractive and polluting industries to systems more reliant on clean energy and more resilient to disruptions by climate-change-driven weather events.

Fortunately, many of the technologies we need are already available. And they are being implemented right here in Colorado. In 2024, Colorado overtook California as the EV capital of the United States with 25.3% in new EV sales. The electricity delivered by Holy Cross Energy was 85% clean last year.

We can get to a cleaner, safer, healthier future, but Ms. Granger’s false choice doesn’t help us.

Chris Hoffman, Boulder

We Don’t Need More Band-Aids for Xcel’s Expensive, Unreliable Electric System

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera on January 30th, 2026

You’ve probably noticed it. Xcel’s electric system is becoming increasingly expensive and increasingly unreliable. Great combo… Well, maybe not.

The sad news is “We ain’t seen nothing yet.”

Xcel’s rates are likely to go up — and their reliability is likely to go down. Hang on to your hats — and your bank accounts — and, yes, do make emergency plans and get a battery if you can.

What is a community to do?

First, it is important to understand the root causes of the situation.

Xcel is an investor-owned utility that has had a monopoly in its service territory for close to a century. While the people who work for Xcel are good, competent and caring people, monopolies are not known for their price discipline or their success in innovation.

While we now have three good Commissioners at the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, it takes a long time to get an entity that hasn’t been well-regulated under control, and it is very difficult to have price discipline without competition.

While Xcel’s sales have been close to flat for the last 20 years, its after-tax profits have more than tripled, with Xcel having $782 million in after-tax net income in Colorado in 2024! That’s a lot of millions — but of course, a significant amount goes to Wall Street in dividends, not to our communities to build a 21st-century electrical system.

Xcel is in the process of spending hundreds of millions of dollars on what might be called “expensive Band-Aids” for their dilapidated 20th-century system of poles and wires. Those Band-Aids will drive up our rates because when Xcel spends money, we pay the bills. Yet these expensive Band-Aids are likely to fail at protecting us from wildfires or improving reliability in the face of the increasingly extreme weather driven by a warming planet.

Similar to the situation with an old car that requires expensive repairs, and is still unreliable, it becomes time to “bite the bullet,” take on a new car payment and get a new set of wheels. So it is with our electrical system. It is time for a new, 21st-century model.

The good news is we have much of the technology that will allow us to build a 21st-century electrical system with greatly reduced reliance on the vulnerable poles and wires of the 20th century.

The key is to put as much generation and storage as close to load as possible. Storage includes the very large batteries in electric vehicles, including trucks and buses.

While it can appear cheaper to build big wind, solar and gas plants a long way from where the electricity is needed, those calculations often ignore the often very high costs of transmission.

In addition, the costs of utility-scale generation often assume that outages have no costs — something that Boulder County residents and businesses know is clearly false. What are the costs of throwing out food or not being able to work or closing your business or of being very cold or not having the medical equipment you need to stay alive? Those costs are clearly not zero.

So instead of spending hundreds of millions and even billions of dollars on expensive Band-Aids for the 20th-century system, we need to get serious about adding as much solar and storage as close as possible to load and tying the solar and storage and electric vehicle batteries and flexible loads (like water heaters and other appliances) together with computers to make locally controlled microgrids and virtual power plants.

While Xcel has made some small and begrudging steps in the direction of microgrids and virtual power plants, they are overwhelmingly focused on building large, distant generation combined with expensive transmission and complex, vulnerable distribution systems. That approach requires large capital investments that Xcel can control, and the bigger their capital investments, the higher our rates and the bigger their profits.

The Boulder City Council is to be credited with deciding to focus on the reliability and resilience of our electrical system in 2026. Please talk to your local and state elected officials and let them know you want a 21st-century electrical system — not a 20th-century system with expensive and ineffectual Band-Aids.

Leslie Glustrom has been an intervenor and a participant at the Colorado PUC for over 20 years. She is a Senior Advisor to Clean Energy Action and a member of Empower Our Future and the Colorado Coalition for a Livable Climate. She is trained as a biochemist and lives in Boulder. 

It’s Time to Ban New Oil and Gas Drilling in Colorado

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera on December 31st, 2025

“Vast swaths of the ponderosa pine forests that blanket Colorado’s Front Range mountains could turn rust-colored and die over the next five years.”  – Daily Camera front page story.

Let’s connect three dots and take action: (1) The die-offs will be caused by beetles. But, as the article continues, (2) “continuous warmer temperatures and drought — conditions made more likely by climate change — have sapped otherwise healthy trees’ defenses to the beetles.” (3) Over 97% of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change primarily through the burning of fossil fuels. Fossil fuel companies have known this connection between their product and climate change since at least the 1970s. 

Connecting these three dots makes it clear that it’s high time to do what we should have done years earlier. We should begin to transition to a better future by banning new oil and gas drilling. Such a ban could allow for continued pumping from existing wells but would phase out modifications to those thousands of wells through re-drilling or deepening. Unused drilling permits would expire. Previous operators of orphaned wells would have to pay more to hasten state cleanup efforts. 

So, when you start to see our beautiful front-range trees turning brown, think “fossil fuels are doing this.” And then contact your legislator and the governor and ask them to phase out fossil fuel drilling, so you can also think: “I’m doing something to change it.”

Chris Hoffman, Boulder

Coloradans Shouldn’t Pay for Xcel’s Coal Mistakes

Published in the Denver Post on November 24th, 2025

Just last year, Colorado was leading the Mountain West in the transition from dirty coal plants to clean energy. Federal funding was assisting on rural clean energy while coal plant retirement dates were on track to meet the state’s critical climate goals.

How quickly things change.

This year the Trump administration is resisting coal’s decline with unprecedented executive orders and by actively canceling and stalling clean energy projects meant to bring down energy prices, killing thousands of renewable energy jobs.

Unfortunately, some Pueblo County leaders and Congressman Jeff Hurd joined in and informed Colorado regulators that they intend to ask President Trump to keep coal-fired operations at  Pueblo’s Comanche 2 and 3 coal units continuing indefinitely.

The sudden push to keep coal burning is a slap in the face to Colorado voters who have supported renewable energy, more affordable bills, and who are demanding cleaner air. Surely they could expect Gov. Polis to step in to defend the state’s critical climate goals, right?

Apparently not. In a shocking twist, the state of Colorado just sided with Xcel Energy and petitioned regulators to keep the Comanche 2 unit open past its retirement date scheduled for the end of the year to cover for Comanche 3’s most recent, massive outage.

In effect, this agreement would allow Xcel Energy to charge customers for its own mistakes. If approved, Xcel Energy can run Comanche 2 for an additional year without clear guidelines to restrict pollution. This means the company could run Comanche 2 past its retirement date in addition to Comanche 3 once it’s repaired. Instead of one coal unit burning in 2026, there could be two — a full abandonment of previous commitments, which could increase air pollution and potentially raise energy costs for Coloradans.

Comanche 3 has been a reliability disaster and its pollution contributes to disease and cancer.  Given its high cost–both financially and in its toll on public health–and its frequent outages, backtracking on coal retirements has nothing but downsides for Pueblo and Xcel ratepayers.

As a local environmental justice policy advocate, I’ve participated in an enormous amount of debates over what to do about Comanche 3 and have talked to countless people in the community. People want clean energy and good-paying jobs.

Xcel’s motivations are clear. Coal is expensive and they have a captive customer base allowing them to send big profits to their shareholders and CEOs. These profits are earned off the backs of workers while pollution costs the public millions in healthcare bills.

A truly “just” transition should include treating Pueblo with respect, addressing historical inequities like those experienced by the Pueblo community, and giving back to the community for helping to power Colorado for decades at the expense of its own public health.

A recent study found an advanced Renewable Energy Park could replace $40 million in lost annual tax revenue and provide 300 permanent jobs. That’s more money and more jobs than Comanche 3 is providing now. Pueblo could continue exporting power in Colorado, but this time with cleaner air and lower costs. Instead of only gratifying profits, we can advocate for utilities like Xcel to prioritize massive buildouts of rooftop solar to help reduce energy bills for families and businesses.

In Colorado, jobs in the clean energy sector are already outpacing jobs in fossil fuel industries and wages in renewable energy are outpacing the national average which could benefit Pueblo’s economic future while also protecting workers, public health, and the environment.

If you agree that Colorado needs to move past coal and embrace our renewable energy future, I encourage you to contact the Public Utilities Commission and tell them we don’t need federal and corporate interference in already settled matters. Let them know that you believe a just energy transition should address the historic inequities resulting from Xcel’s coal plant as well as our current climate realities with the implementation of a renewable energy park that can provide jobs and tax revenues with little or no pollution.

Jamie Valdez is a community advocate from Pueblo and works with GreenLatinos as a Colorado Transportation and Energy Advocate.

Let Elected Officials Know: There Must be No New Harmful Fracking Projects in Colorado!

CCLC’s Partners, Safe and Healthy Colorado (SHCO) and Save the Aurora Reservoir (STAR) have worked relentlessly for years to prevent development of the the Sunlight – Long Aurora Reservoir fracking project east of Denver. The final decision of the Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) is upon us. Please act now, and no later than November 19th.

Facts about the dangerous Sunlight-Long Fracking Mega Pad:

  • 32 fracking wells on a 35-acre site, making it one of the largest fracking well pads in Colorado.
  • 3,000 ft to the nearest homes — a distance that, as new Colorado-based research shows, increases the risk of childhood cancer.
  • 3,300 ft from the Aurora Reservoir — less than the 1 mile setback we fought to get written into the revised and updated County regulations.
  • 17,000 vehicle trips producing high emissions on a service road located 500 ft from the reservoir and less than 2,500 ft from homes before production even begins.

The State of Colorado has not yet approved this mega pad, and our voices can still make a difference.

Action of the Week: Call Your Elected Leaders before Nov. 19th!

  • Gov. Jared Polis — (303) 866-4075
  • Sen. John Hickenlooper — (303) 244-1628
  • Sen. Michael Bennet — (303) 455-7600
  • Rep. Jason Crow — (720) 748-7514
  • Rep. Mike Coffman — (303) 739-7015

o   Suggested Call Script:

Hi, my name is [Your Name], and I’m a constituent from [City/Zip]. I’m calling to express concern about the proposed Sunlight-Long fracking pad near the Aurora Reservoir. This fracking pad threatens public health, air quality, and our limited water supply.

Over 10,000 families will be at risk if this pad goes through. We need our elected officials to stand with our community and urge the ECMC to stop or relocate this fracking pad in line with Colorado’s SB-181, which prioritizes public health and safety.”

**You can personalize your call by sharing if you’re a parent, teacher, local resident, or homeowner and why you care about protecting our community.

If you can, please:

Share this Action of the Week on Instagram

Share this Action of the Week on Facebook

Share this Action of the Week on BlueSky

Trump’s U.N. Speech Should be Major Cause of Concern

Published in the Denver Post on September 30th, 2025

Re: “Trump criticizes countries at U.N.,” Sept. 24 news story

Just over a year ago, we were bemoaning the fact that President Joe Biden’s advisors and the press had not called the question of his mental acuity far sooner than they did. Following President Trump’s United Nations speech, described on the front page of The Denver Post this morning, it is time to raise the question about his mental acuity. His speech was unhinged, often not founded in fact, and rambled badly.

As I volunteer for several groups focused on climate issues, I pay close attention to what the president says and does in relation to that topic. Leaving aside what he has already done to destroy the ability of the U.S. to take a leadership role in the manufacture and adoption of clean energy, his speech called on the world to refer to coal as “clean, beautiful coal,” told world leaders that their countries would fail if they didn’t stop falling for “the green scam,” repeated false information about the cost of renewable energy, and talked about how renewable energy would require subsidies (avoiding the fact that global oil subsidies are far higher). And then there was the rambling, which, I’m sorry to say, we are getting used to and seemingly accepting. Watching the world leaders with their stunned faces reminded me that we can’t get used to what we are seeing; those who have the power to do so need to call this into question.

So who is going to raise the issue of the president’s mental acuity? Let’s start with an editorial from The Denver Post.

Lynn K. Rhodes Fritz, Lakewood

Page 2 of 11